He's saying that marriage is an individual's fundamental right. The state can decide those details insofar that they cannot curtail that fundamental right. Denying marriage based on sex is the same as denying it based on race, i.e. amounting to a denial of an individual's fundamental right to marry. What's this nonsense about a fundamental right to same-sex marriage? That's a ridiculous logical fallacy--no one is arguing that the same-sex part is the fundamental right. It's the marriage part that is.
no subject
He's saying that marriage is an individual's fundamental right. The state can decide those details insofar that they cannot curtail that fundamental right. Denying marriage based on sex is the same as denying it based on race, i.e. amounting to a denial of an individual's fundamental right to marry. What's this nonsense about a fundamental right to same-sex marriage? That's a ridiculous logical fallacy--no one is arguing that the same-sex part is the fundamental right. It's the marriage part that is.