THIS IS NOT NEWS EITHER
Jun. 30th, 2008 04:53 pmPlayed for humor, this video nevertheless raises a good point. (Minor spoilers for Wall*E).
We all know that most of our menial jobs will be eliminated whenever it is we get around to making robots that do them. Odds are good we'll have maybe two minutes to worry about that before the robots take over and kill us all, but it's something to think about. Specifically as regards our approach to fiction set in such a future as would have service robots.
The question I ask is this: would we move towards classlessness or would socio-economic stratification become all the more entrenched and ugly as a result of replacing poorer labor with synthetic labor? My money is on the cynical answer--that as soon as people get closer to the poverty line/unemployment as a result of not having skills to do jobs that robots can't, society as a whole starts shitting on them more than ever. Something to ponder.
*
They call it the "Global Literacy 2008" issue. So why not completely simplify shit and undermine the idea of literacy--which is an ability to decipher complex thought in addition to simple grammar and vocabulary--by positiing this riveting question? I can't find the cover picture anywhere, though you can see a small picture of it on their homepage now, but it is pretty stupendously...stupid. Imagine two stuffy, fairly old white guys standing back-to-back like prizefighters bumping shoulders while posing for heavyweight championship posters. That's Abe Lincoln and Chuck Darwin posing. And the title reads: "Lincoln vs. Darwin: Who Matters More?"
Can we say "false dichotomy" much?
( I might have to, as they say, choke a bastard. )
Fuck you, Newsweek. Fuck you and your anti-intellectualism, nationalist ass-licking "news." If you want to publish an article saying that Lincoln was awesome, fine. If you'd like to take a closer look as to WHY Darwin has fallen out of favor, that might, in some way, be relevant to how we live today. (The answer, by the by, is because ignorance rules the day. If Newsweek can offer opinion as fact, so can I.) Fuck you, you fucking fucks.
We all know that most of our menial jobs will be eliminated whenever it is we get around to making robots that do them. Odds are good we'll have maybe two minutes to worry about that before the robots take over and kill us all, but it's something to think about. Specifically as regards our approach to fiction set in such a future as would have service robots.
The question I ask is this: would we move towards classlessness or would socio-economic stratification become all the more entrenched and ugly as a result of replacing poorer labor with synthetic labor? My money is on the cynical answer--that as soon as people get closer to the poverty line/unemployment as a result of not having skills to do jobs that robots can't, society as a whole starts shitting on them more than ever. Something to ponder.
*
They call it the "Global Literacy 2008" issue. So why not completely simplify shit and undermine the idea of literacy--which is an ability to decipher complex thought in addition to simple grammar and vocabulary--by positiing this riveting question? I can't find the cover picture anywhere, though you can see a small picture of it on their homepage now, but it is pretty stupendously...stupid. Imagine two stuffy, fairly old white guys standing back-to-back like prizefighters bumping shoulders while posing for heavyweight championship posters. That's Abe Lincoln and Chuck Darwin posing. And the title reads: "Lincoln vs. Darwin: Who Matters More?"
Can we say "false dichotomy" much?
( I might have to, as they say, choke a bastard. )
Fuck you, Newsweek. Fuck you and your anti-intellectualism, nationalist ass-licking "news." If you want to publish an article saying that Lincoln was awesome, fine. If you'd like to take a closer look as to WHY Darwin has fallen out of favor, that might, in some way, be relevant to how we live today. (The answer, by the by, is because ignorance rules the day. If Newsweek can offer opinion as fact, so can I.) Fuck you, you fucking fucks.