(no subject)
Oct. 22nd, 2006 10:05 pmThe Prestige is as well-crafted as you can imagine, well-acted besides. I'm not obsessed. Not that Christian Bale and Hugh Jackman weren't diverting. More impressive still? There wasn't that much of Teh Gay running around despite it being a movie about two guys in an obsessive spiral with each other. I won't say more, as even giving my opinion would be something of a spoiler.
So, spoilers? Those go in the comments, okay? THERE ARE SPOILERS IN THE COMMENTS! Go on, spoil.
Also,
ivy03? The actor playing the lawyer is not Tempus from Lois and Clark. He's the Sheriff of Rotingham from Robin Hood: Men in Tights.
So, spoilers? Those go in the comments, okay? THERE ARE SPOILERS IN THE COMMENTS! Go on, spoil.
Also,
no subject
Date: 2006-10-23 02:44 am (UTC)And you're right, there wasn't that much of Teh Gay, hot as that might have been. There was maybe one line that struck me with its blatant slashtacularity, and that was it.
Still, I loved it. I loved just the TOUCH of sci-fi woven into a mostly real-world-possibly story. I loved the layers, I loved how themes echoed. I loved how they told you exactly what you needed to know to figure out the "trick", but it was still a surprise. I love that the "trick" on Jackman's character's side is basically the bird trick over and over, using himself as the bird. I love that they tell the truth without telling the truth.
In short, this is my new Matrix-level obsessive film. LOVE.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-23 02:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-23 03:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-23 03:53 am (UTC)And while Hugh Jackman was cute as always, I was much more impressed by the makeup department managing to make David Bowie NOT look like a walking corpse!
no subject
Date: 2006-10-23 04:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-23 05:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-23 05:03 am (UTC)Also, I felt like the Hugh Jackman story was obvious (his obsession making him more and more crazed, etc) but that there wasn't enough time devoted to the Christian Bale part. I did figure out his story, sure, but only because of the anvil-sized clues midway through and the fact that Christian Bale didn't seem to be cast in the crazy focused/obsessed role (the trick is him being cast in that role and making it more obsessive than the "obsessive" role Jackman was playing).
I feel dumb though, because as
no subject
Date: 2006-10-23 10:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-23 11:35 am (UTC)When
no subject
Date: 2006-10-23 02:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-23 02:44 pm (UTC)It's an easy mistake to make, really, stupid British people looking so alike (that's half why I could believe they could find a Jackman look-alike in the movie, and he's not even really British! He's British colonial!).
no subject
Date: 2006-10-23 02:52 pm (UTC)Yeah, not obsessed, me. I think I got burnt out on the magic films with The Illusionist, which I enjoyed more. This one left me feeling vaguely disappointed, but a revisit will probably satisfy me more because, armed with the answers from the start, I can watch each scene again (instead of just replaying in my head) and look again at the clues, see how well it was revealed or not. As was, I think the psychologies didn't get enough play, lost behind the melodrama of wives and mistresses (and boy was Scarlett Johanssen useless here), and when those aren't at the fore (the one-upping was, but the darker side of obsession was kept to the very end) you just work at figuring out the trick. So, I guess, my problem is I'm a little too much like Alfred Borden--I'm not appreciating the show, I'm working out the gag.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-23 03:25 pm (UTC)So, for those who know the type, it becomes easy to spot, and just... really really true.
But yes. Ask her. This is what made the movie amazing for me, quite honestly.