trinityvixen: (Default)
[personal profile] trinityvixen
Part of the problem with getting rid of who they did in Serenity is that it leaves characters unfleshed out. Now, I loved Wash and his exit really bothered me, but it is the road not travelled for Shepherd Book that I lament because of the mystery. Then I had a think about it after the second time through, and I'm thinking something along the lines of this:

Book was an Operative.

Consider the speech that Book gives Mal when they first go to Haven to hide. He says that it's important to believe, that belief is all that will get a man through his darkest times. When Mal goes to Inara, the first thing she tells him back on board Serenity is that the Operative is a believer. It's not out of the way to infer that Book is a believer--as a Shepherd, that belief is now vested in God--but why do I think Book's belief makes him a likely candidate for being an Operative?

From the pilot episode "Serenity," Book demonstrates his uncanny knowledge of many things on the shadier side of human life and experience, which does not go unnoticed by the shady-savvy crewmembers (Mal, Zoe, and Jayne most particularly). But it is in "Serenity" that Book makes one of his most illuminating statements; when Mal shoots the lawman, Dobson, he says to Inara that he's not sure if he thinks Mal did the wrong thing despite the fact that his beliefs say the captain was in the wrong and the fact that Book had sworn to protect Dobson. Book is shaken as he never again is; he later engages in fairly criminal activities to help the crew along, including coming to Mal's rescue in "War Stories," but it is only in the pilot that Book seems unsure if his belief is strong enough. It makes sense that, as either a retired or down-sized Operative, Book, like the Operative, would have been looking for something else to believe in. He found God; when that belief was tested, almost shown to be faulty outright, he was returned to that state of disillusionment that he would have been in at his retirement.

In "Objects in Space," River hears him thinking: "I don't give half a hump if you're innocent or not. So what does that make you?" Clearly, Book's mind is still working on some interesting, un-Christian precepts he picked up from his life before the Abbey. The Operative uses some of the same language. He will do evil, he is a monster, but he will do it because he believes it is right. Somewhere, deep inside, Book is still that monster. Joss Whedon's commentary on the episode further's my argument. He describes how Jubal Early manages to subdue or overpower each crewmember according to the best way to reason/combat them. He tackles Simon with logic and hope, Kaylee with emotional violence, and uses physical violence and restraint against Mal, Zoe (and Wash, as they're together), Jayne, and Book. Book is elevated to a threat the equivalent of a man half his age with twice his temper (aka Mal) by Early. Book is taken out with physical violence because the part of Early that understands each of the crew understands that that is the only way he will win over Book. Early is the only one who really gets it--"That ain't a Shepherd."

Wow. There's like evidence for this. I'm amazed. It was something random I came up with last night...but it's making more sense the more I think about it. It's kinda a buzz kill that Book's been killed off and that the Operative, both the position and the man, are, as far as Serenity is concerned, dealt with, over and done. There probably won't be anything made about Book's past if the movie is picked up for sequels or (Teh Squeeeee!) more Firefly--after all, when Mal says Book is going to have to tell him how come he knows so much about the Alliance, Book says, "No, I don't." I don't think we have to hear it either, really, but now I know we won't.

Next mystery to solve: How Inara keeps her hair looking that fabulous in the middle of a gunfight. Am having visions of Spaceballs and Inara flipping out:

"My hair! They shot my {something long and complicated in Mandarin} hair!" ::cocks gun, blows Alliance away::

Date: 2005-10-02 02:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ivy03.livejournal.com
I had the exact same reaction to Book. I said to chuckro as we were leaving the theater: 1 - Joss pretty much acknowledged straight out that Book's story is what you thought it was, and 2 - if he had told Book's story, the character arc would be that of the Operative. I consider the Operative's development to be just what Book went through. So you can both assume that Book used to be an operative and that the Operative will change his life in the way that Book did. Two half stories about different characters and together they make a whole story.

Date: 2005-10-02 02:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] trinityvixen.livejournal.com
Ah, didn't think I'd be the only one to cotton on to that theory. I get the two people telling one story bit. It's quite clever because it's not really that important to Firefly virgins, but makes a helluva lot of sense when you put the series and the movie together. It just goes to show that Joss can juggle threads. Some review I read of Serenity (a less-than-favorable one, actuall) made mention of how Joss probably had a story for every square inch of his movie canvas....like that's a bad thing? Better than Lucas who just sticks 'ooh! aliens!' into every scene and then has to come u p with names and identities after the fact. I'd rather have someone in control of their imagination but not controlling it, know what I mean?

Date: 2005-10-02 03:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] neo-leviathan.livejournal.com
If there are Serenity sequals, which Joss has said there will be if Serenity does well and there is enough interest, then Wash and Book (Book especially) will be the two main characters to be fleshed out and explored, and that they two characters would be back, and quote "Not in a cheesy twin-brother kind of way".

And he said that the reason he killed Wash is because everyone likes him and he's not a combatant, so people dont really expect him to be killed before people like Zoe or Jayne

Date: 2005-10-02 03:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] neo-leviathan.livejournal.com
PS - that lot is neither speculation nor internet stuff, that is straight from the mouth of Joss at the Melbourne Q&A pre-screening where we actually met him in person.

Date: 2005-10-02 03:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] trinityvixen.livejournal.com
I think Ivy had the right idea--killing Wash so brutally right before the big battle means putting us all off our guard. It meant anyone, any character, no matter how indispensable or loved, was fair game not to make it, especially beloved noncombatants like Kaylee or Simon. Many are already pretty certain that, sequels being a given, Simon or Kaylee is toast (they are also cute!couple on the ship now, and look at how well that worked for Zoe and Wash...).

As for bringing either Book or Wash back...I doubt both would work. One, maybe, you could work an argument for. Both, not so much.

Date: 2005-10-02 03:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] neo-leviathan.livejournal.com
killing Wash so brutally right before the big battle means putting us all off our guard. It meant anyone, any character, no matter how indispensable or loved, was fair game not to make it
Yep, very much what Joss said

I'm not sure on the Kaylee/Simon = dead thing, but on the bringing Wash/Book back, Joss said that the actors who played them would be back, and Wash and Book would be getting explored in more depth.
We are currently thinking some kind of flashbacks maybe, or perhaps hallucinations, or something along those lines.

Date: 2005-10-02 03:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] trinityvixen.livejournal.com
Hallucinations are fun for the whole family. Book I can see pulling an Obi-Wan on Mal, but that could get old fast. There has to be a reason for them to be on board, something specific that their ressurrections accomplishes to make it at all worth it. With Buffy coming back from the dead, well, it was kinda necessary. I'm not sure what the justification for Spike's return on Angel was, but I'm sure there was some reason invented or explained to have him around. Just flashbacking and dragging Wash and Book out will feel like a cheat, a tease.

On the other hand, yay! They're not breaking up the happy family.

Date: 2005-10-02 06:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tophets-tool.livejournal.com
Greetings, person who I've never been introduced to before (internet etiquette is horribly confusing).

I've come (on the advice of umeyard, who's on my flist and told me you were the One to come to with Serenity/Firefly queries, O Mighty Brain) to grovel for your advice: I am British and have hence never seen Firefly on TV. I have been squeeing over the Serenity trailers like woah, and have the whole series on rental order now, but my question is this: should I watch Serenity first, or Firefly? Can I watch the film without Firefly backup? Would it be more fun to come to it fresh? Will I miss a bunch of juicy in-jokes if I do? Help! *she wailed*

(p.s. Umeyard told me you recommended my Half-Blood Prince parody to her so (a)I love you and (b)see (a))

Date: 2005-10-02 07:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] trinityvixen.livejournal.com
::dies:::

::resurrects nervously:: Hii-i.

Yes, you can enjoy Serenity without seeing Firefly. Jokes I don't think you'll miss, but you won't have the same emotional impact if you haven't seen some of the series.

If you're still back-logged on the series, and since you're probably going to want to own it once you see it (everyone I've shown it to is of this opinion, so I feel confident in making that statement), erm, e-mail me? I can send you ::ahem:: ::wink wink:: ::nudge nudge:: Gotcha? 300-400 mb files, ::cough cough::?

Hi! I really did like your parody a lot. I could link to it here, but that might make me fangirl 'splode. Hi!

Date: 2005-10-02 07:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tophets-tool.livejournal.com
SEE THIS RIGHT HERE?

THIS IS ME BEING IN LOVE WITH YOU. :D:D:D

*goes back to sitting in front of Online Rental Ordering Service shrieking 'Post, dammit!' at screen*


...why is real life so much slower than the internet?

Date: 2005-10-02 07:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] trinityvixen.livejournal.com
::ahem::

Yes, okay, well, let me see. Can I send these files through g-mail? I dunno, but just drop me an e-mail, and I'll give it a try when I get back to my home computer with the ::cough cough::

::in louder voice:: I THINK WATCHING AT LEAST THE PILOT IS A GOOD IDEA BEFORE GOING TO SEE SERENITY. IT IS A GOOD THING YOU WILL BE ::cough:: RENTING IT IN A PERFECTLY LEGITIMATE FASHION.

Yes.

Date: 2005-10-03 07:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tophets-tool.livejournal.com
ABSOLUTELY. I WILL BE RENTING THEM TOMORROW, UTTERLY LEGITMATELY.

on a totally unrelated note my email is celare_ulace@yahoo.co.uk.


On another unrelated note, I love you. In the scary stalker way, not the regular affectionate way, you understand.

Profile

trinityvixen: (Default)
trinityvixen

February 2015

S M T W T F S
1234567
89 1011121314
15161718192021
22232425 262728

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 30th, 2026 02:41 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios