I believe I've stated, many a time, how very much I
loathe all sub-human
creatures who feel the need to make uninvited comments about my physical appearance that are divorced from, say, concerns about my well-being (I would gladly welcome comments and offers of assistance were I to be hobbling down the street after being mugged, for example). For reasons that are obvious to
every woman and (I would hope) most men, the constant reminder of the fact that I am in possession of OMGTITS and OMG they want them is really unnecessary. Also, it makes me want to take a hammer to your nutsack and leave you without the troublesome hormones that seem to be causing
me problems. You are warned.
Today, I go to pick up a diet pepsi from the cart outside (it's cheaper than the machine in the cafeteria), and as I fish for my purse, I hear the guy say, "You want help with that?" I give him a funny look--confused as to why he should want to help me fish around in my purse, especially as, by the time he finished speaking, I'd extracted my wallet. I go to take out some coins to pay, asking him, very disingenuously, "Huh?" He repeats it with a nod at me. "With squeezing things. So much squeezing to do..." He trails off, laughing, as if he's been terribly boys-will-be-boys naughty-cute and isn't that so charming?
For reference, I am wearing my
Lenore shirt that
viridian got me for Christmas. Over a year ago, one of the post-docs at work politely told me that, given the unfortunate positioning of the word bubble on the shirt, it's divorced from the picture of a little dead girl and the wide-eyed hamster victims that she's going to love to death (a la Elmira). In other words, due to massive tit obstruction, you can clearly read,
"So much squeezin' to do, so little time!" and see only the top of Lenore's head.
And isn't it
so funny to comment on that and pretend that it gives you leave to LEER AT MY CHEST and to interpret the words there as a come-hither?
I fucking love
Lenore the comic, and I love this shirt for its gleeful sadism (it comes from a short where she wants a toy with eyes that pop and mistakes directions and goes to the pet store and squishes hamsters instead for the eye-popping effect). So, clearly as this shirt somehow sends out radio waves to short-circuit people's brains, I must wear it only in the house and find
THIS shirt and wear it out instead. I just need to add something about
KEEPING YOUR FUCKING THOUGHTS ABOUT WANTING TO GROPE ME TO YOURSELF, PERVERT to it.
*
In other news:
more proof that evo-psych is TOTAL BULLSHIT. There are so many things wrong with that study, I can't even tell you. Basically, they hand-waved away a
signficant detail wherein they showed that people of a different culture
have different color preferences and biases because it disproved their affirmation of pink = girly. Forget that two hundred years ago pink = MANLY--PINK IS FOR GIRLS BECAUSE THEY USED TO GATHER FRUIT AND SHIT. Yes, because,
clearly, men could not be gatherers due to their bias in selecting moldy, rotted fruit.
And this is another study meant to piss me off and no other reason. Women, as a general trend, use landmarks in their navigation more than spacialization. I give directions that have route numbers and major sights to see so people know they're going the right way. But that only applies to situations involving one or more persons (myself included) who might not know the way. The fact that I can navigate a grocery store because I remember the cat food is next to the garbage bags and tin foil doesn't mean I'm a better at shopping. It means I've, OMG, been to the store before and looked for those items. Anyone living next to a store for long enough will begin to memorize its layout and prioritize its contents according to what he or she wants/needs.
Also? GIVE UP ON THE HUNTER-GATHERER CRAP. Honestly, the workings of genes are far more subtle than "women collect growing food, men hunt moving food." And, once you start a community, you'll find that individuals with only slight improvements in a color or directional navigation sense really won't make an impact. If just
one individual can spot the fruit or remember where home is, the rest benefit and survive. Community can muddle the impact of genes, so the less fit will also survive to pass on genes.
Making generalizations of this sort frighten me. There's nothing you can say is the
sole provence of man or woman save the XX or the Y chromosomes (and, even then, it's tricky) from an evolutionary stand point when you are studying people so wholely shaped by their environment, which, more than ever, is masquing genetic effects with the interference of medicine and community. HAAAATE evo psyche....