I need a DC person...STAT
Aug. 9th, 2006 01:36 amAccording to some trivia on the IMDB (I know, I know, not exactly evidence, but I'm excited, so shh!), although Chloe on Smallville wasn't ever in DC canon for Superman, DC was going to introduce her (probably because she is insanely cool and popular, and major comics houses do that sort of thing all the time and continuity/integrity be damned!). My question is simply this: was she?
Because really, that would make me feel much, much better. In watching over the early season five episodes so far, Chloe has become thirty bajillion times awesomer than anything, and she was always pretty cool to begin with. She's the adult on the show, where the adults all act like children and the children all act like brats. And I used to haaaaate that she was sweet on Clark, but she plays it so well, and so not angsty (unlike everyone else, again), so adult, that I break a little every time Clark is like "You're such a good friend." Because, if DC hasn't invoked her in continuity, she is so doomed (not to mention that I want to slap Clark upside the head for going after finnicky, whiny, angsty, stupid Lana when Chloe is so amazing and right there). Damn it, I need to find out if she got into canon. Oh pleaseohpleaseohpleaseohpleaseohpleaseohplease...
Besides that, I still want James Marstsers as Brainiac/Spike/random dude to dooooooo me. "Splinter" was an awesome episode. It took something that looked like it was bound to be hackneyed and made-for-the-show, what-is-canon-anyway? stuff into this awesome thing what awesomed spectacularly with James Marsters doing the awesoming (seriously, there is no other adjective-verb-noun to decribe it). The Smallville Zod had better be something amazing to warrant his work, I tells you.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-09 05:58 am (UTC)If you like her so much, I should bring by the DVDs with the "Chloe Chronicles" :)
no subject
Date: 2006-08-09 02:36 pm (UTC)If you like her so much, I should bring by the DVDs with the "Chloe Chronicles" :)
Now, see, the thing is I'm not sure Chloe works out of context. As in, I'm not sure she plays as well solo as she does off of others. Hence my not wanting to watch Veronica Mars because it seemed like the Nancy Drew/Chloe Sullivan crossover hour.
But yeah, why not? Are they any good?
no subject
Date: 2006-08-09 03:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-09 03:14 pm (UTC)OH MY GOD I JUST CURSED THAT INTO EXISTING. WHYYYYYY!?!!?!
ask a silly question...
Date: 2006-08-09 03:20 pm (UTC)...because you have a secret desire to watch Lana-porn? After all lets face facts. An all Lana hour would eventual devolve into porn anyway with all the stripping and the sex scenes they would have to do to keep people interested (just look at her in the first 2 seasons).
Re: ask a silly question...
Date: 2006-08-09 03:40 pm (UTC)Now, speaking as someone who is a girl and has kissed girls, a kiss? It's nothing. Certainly, it has nothing on porno. And kissing a guy versus kissing a girl? Not much of a difference either way if the kiss doesn't turn you on (and, as a "professional actress"--NOTE: IRONY--Kristin Kreuk shouldn't be turned on by any of the people she kisses on the show--and she kisses quite a few of them). If I were her? I wouldn't have batted an eye at kissing the vampire chick any more than I would have kissing Tom Welling (okay, so I might have gotten a little more fluttery kissing him...)
BUT AHHHH!!! NO ONE IN THEIR RIGHT (or, in my case, INSANE) MIND WOULD EVER WANT TO SEE LANA LANG JUST BE LANA LANG FOR ANY LONGER THAN THEY ABSOLUTELY HAVE TO TO GET THROUGH SMALLVILLE.
Just ugh, dude. Even before you made it dirty. UGH.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-09 01:27 pm (UTC)They're going to put Zod in Smallville...?
no subject
Date: 2006-08-09 02:39 pm (UTC)When the season's over, I'll SPOIL you for whether they managed it or not.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-09 02:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-09 04:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-09 05:38 pm (UTC)