Now for the angry September 11th post
Sep. 11th, 2006 08:57 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
trinityvixenFrom The New York Times:
Sunday evening, Mr. Bush paid tribute to the victims, laying wreathsin small reflecting pools at ground zero, one in the footprint of eachtower. It was a hint of life in a place that still brims with memoriesof death, a reminder that even five years later, the attacks are not sovery distant.
He vowed that he was “never going to forget the lessons of that day.”
Oh no? How come all of the goodwill and togetherness got swept away so you could continue doing as you wanted? Perhaps because you played hate politics to stay in power? Do you not remember how it was immediately after? How people came together and how the world wanted to help us, help us heal, share our grief? Perhaps you don't remember, Mr. Bush. Maybe Jon Stewart can remind you. (Link stolen from![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
newredshoes, but I'm sure she'd encourage me to pass it on).
Sunday evening, Mr. Bush paid tribute to the victims, laying wreathsin small reflecting pools at ground zero, one in the footprint of eachtower. It was a hint of life in a place that still brims with memoriesof death, a reminder that even five years later, the attacks are not sovery distant.
He vowed that he was “never going to forget the lessons of that day.”
Oh no? How come all of the goodwill and togetherness got swept away so you could continue doing as you wanted? Perhaps because you played hate politics to stay in power? Do you not remember how it was immediately after? How people came together and how the world wanted to help us, help us heal, share our grief? Perhaps you don't remember, Mr. Bush. Maybe Jon Stewart can remind you. (Link stolen from
newredshoes, but I'm sure she'd encourage me to pass it on).
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2006-09-12 08:43 pm (UTC)1 and 2, thank you for clarifying. I know it's hard to detect patronizing because I'm guilty of it. Sometimes it really does just take people telling you to even see it. So if I snapped it's because that's a buzzkill and immediate bad-mood maker for me (probably directly as a result of being guilty of it myself).
As for 3: I shouldn't dislike Bush for voting right and acting like a Texan? But I do dislike that behavior when you make it national policy. The beauty of our system is that, if that flies in Texas, Texas can do it until the cows come home. On a federal level, you should be forced to compromise more and not just insult or insinuate about your constituents' "manliness" (God, I hate testosterone politics) or their being with the terrorists (if you're not with us, us being BushCo, that's who you're effectively with) until they back down. I hear name-calling on both sides--this is politics, but I didn't hear the left saying "If you don't go to war and stay warring indefinitely despite all the problems therewith, you're a pussy and a traitor." I call that pretty friggin divisive. Suddenly, that greatest savior and exercise of our freedom--dissent--became treason. That's tarring with a wide brush, and I dislike that kind of generalization. Maybe that makes me an effete liberal intellectual, but while I can have a sense of humor about that in a conversation where I can easily turn it right back and make some licentious comments about my inbred redneck friend, on a national debate level, fostering anti-intellectualism, polarized policies on international relations, and dogged penis-size contests with hostile or hesitant leaders? Come on, that's just immature. I'm free to dislike Bush for being an immature, informal President when he's supposed to be doing his job.