trinityvixen: (Default)
[personal profile] trinityvixen
All hail [livejournal.com profile] droidguy1119, for he has brought me THIS.

It's wrong to be really super-psyched about this, right? It's probably not going to be...

...okay, I couldn't even finish that. He picked up his hat and I squealed. People at work are definitely giving me the hairy eyeball.

Date: 2008-02-14 10:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] trinityvixen.livejournal.com
It's a fascinating reveal on Spielberg, though, as a Star Wars fan, I've heard as much about Lucas already. Lucas is not an artist. He's a technician and a businessman, arguably brilliant wearing both hats. He belongs helming ILM and not behind a camera.

Spielberg, I feel, is overrated at times, and I can spot a Spielberg plot a mile back, but for the most part he infuses a sense of people into all his movies. So, while he has heroes, he also has heroes with flaws and quirks of character (which the article said). As opposed to the Heroes With Flaws that Lucas churns out where you can hear the moniker after their names--Anakin is a Hero With Flaws; Indiana Jones is a hero, but he is flawed.

For my money, you can't get better than Jaws for the kinds of scenes the article talks about. Spielberg has a genius scene in there where Chief Brody realizes his son is copying his gestures and they go back and forth--no dialogue--for about three minutes while his wife watches. It's this priceless scene of real life that grounds what is otherwise a sensationalist movie. I love Star Wars but nowhere in the whole of that film do you find a scene like that, not until The Empire Strikes Back (when Lucas is where he should be, i.e. farther away from the story).

Date: 2008-02-15 12:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] droidguy1119.livejournal.com
My problem with Spielberg is that he has trouble resisting cutesyness, like the scene where the jetpack fries cooks the hamburgers in Minority Report.

I still think his most underrated movie, and perhaps best movie (a perfect blend of his dramatic and comedic talents and his ability to have depth while being commercial) is Catch Me If You Can. It is an effortless caper film, but the characters are developed so well and there are great quiet moments like the scene where Hanks tells DiCaprio about his father on the airplane.

Date: 2008-02-15 02:59 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] trinityvixen.livejournal.com
Catch Me If You Can is a brilliant work that manages to reinvent the tired theme that Spielberg drags into all his movies, which is the Problems With Daddies. Seriously, it's a thing with this guy. Catch Me If You Can makes sense of this theme in that the protagonist is a kid who idolizes his father and has to watch the man eat and choke on his pride.

I won't hear a bad thing about Catch Me If You Can, which I would say is a just about perfect film--no wasted moments or performances (best I'd seen out of Christopher Walken EVER), clever pacing, witty but not self-conscious dialogue, and a spirit of fun. Incidentally, Minority Report seems to me a forgotten piece of greatness, too. Again, for the reasons of good characters. Sure, the hero is a tad cookie-cutter (it is Tom Cruise), but the supporting characters, especially Colin Farrell, are just heartbreaking people in the whole and not just caricatures. Love that one, too.

Date: 2008-02-15 03:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] moonlightalice.livejournal.com
Are you serious? I *hated* that movie.

Date: 2008-02-15 03:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] moonlightalice.livejournal.com
That's in response to Catch Me If You Can, not Minority Report (which I actually really enjoy).

Date: 2008-02-15 03:38 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] trinityvixen.livejournal.com
You didn't like Catch Me If You Can? Really? I thought it was dead clever and dry-humor hilarity, wall-to-wall. My heart broke for Leo DiCaprio, which is something I never thought possible after I had to sit through Titanic. And Christopher Walken, like I said, was fabulous.

Plus, from what I hear, the movie is almost entirely accurate to the real story. It was based off a memoir, but the memoir was ghost-written and the man on whom it was all based said the movie did a better job at capturing his life.

Date: 2008-02-15 01:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] moonlightalice.livejournal.com
I *hated* it. It was so incredibly dull and cliche and one-note. I still can't believe I suffered through all two and a half hours of it (I saw it in theaters when it first came out). I do remember really liking the clever title sequence, though!

Date: 2008-02-15 03:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] trinityvixen.livejournal.com
To me, the cheeky title sequence set up the whole thing. I just fell in love with it. I love the interaction between DiCaprio and Hanks, they really just have fun with everything and you can tell that. The fact that it all really happened is the only thing that makes any of this fairy tale seem possible.

Profile

trinityvixen: (Default)
trinityvixen

February 2015

S M T W T F S
1234567
89 1011121314
15161718192021
22232425 262728

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 30th, 2026 06:10 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios