Daniel Day-AWESOME
Feb. 24th, 2008 11:25 amAs the folks who were there all day with me yesterday know, I'm throwing my support behind There Will Be Blood for Best Picture. What made it remarkable was that it was the first movie without one really likable character I really enjoyed. If you can keep me mesmerized for two hours and forty minutes with sparse dialogue and really, really important silences, you've got my vote.
But, alas, I predict the Best Picture Oscar will go either to Juno (a.k.a. the "quirky comedy that could!" throw-away) or No Country For Old Men (a.k.a. the "lack of dramatic completion = WIN!" victory). If Daniel Day-Lewis doesn't take Best Actor, however, oooooh, am I gonna be pissed. Probably not as pissed as I would be if, say, fucking Atonement took Best Picture, but still. He was good. Yes. Can't say more, don't...want...spoil-making!
But, alas, I predict the Best Picture Oscar will go either to Juno (a.k.a. the "quirky comedy that could!" throw-away) or No Country For Old Men (a.k.a. the "lack of dramatic completion = WIN!" victory). If Daniel Day-Lewis doesn't take Best Actor, however, oooooh, am I gonna be pissed. Probably not as pissed as I would be if, say, fucking Atonement took Best Picture, but still. He was good. Yes. Can't say more, don't...want...spoil-making!
no subject
Date: 2008-02-24 04:47 pm (UTC)As I said, I suspect No Country for Old Men might get the award as a sop to the Coen brothers.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-25 06:41 am (UTC)And, not surprisingly, we were both right. DDL got the Oscar, but so did No Country for Old Men. Now let us pray that no other rambling, no-ending movie then Coens put out is ever having to be sopped to again.
I drink your milkshake!
Date: 2008-02-24 05:25 pm (UTC)From what I've heard DDL is the front runner for Best Actor and there's apparently a lot of buzz around "No Country for Old Men". But who knows? Pre-Oscar predictions are never 100% correct.
I've seen all the best picture noms now and I actually don't have a particular favorite. They were all interesting in their own way, though I don't think any of them make my personal list of favorite movies. Though I totally agree with you on "No Country for Old Men", it left me feeling very "meh". I actually liked "Atonement", at least after I processed it. The soundtrack was nifty. But overall I don't have a particular favorite.
Re: I drink your milkshake!
Date: 2008-02-24 06:33 pm (UTC)Re: I drink your milkshake!
Date: 2008-02-24 06:39 pm (UTC)Re: I drink your milkshake!
Date: 2008-02-25 06:45 am (UTC)Atonement just felt rehashed. There was somethign there that might have been an AMAZING thing to dwell on--the consequences of Briony's actions. Instead, she never has to confront the wronged man or the alienated sister. If just ONE of them had been around, it would have made the publishing of the novel important. But since they weren't...who's left to confront her and make her atone? Who is there to accept her apology and sanctify her making-right with true forgiveness? No one. No satisfaction in that for me, alas.
Re: I drink your milkshake!
Date: 2008-02-25 01:31 pm (UTC)I guess the thing with Atonement is that Briony can never really atone for what she did and that's why it takes her so long to actually write the book. Because she can never really make it better. It's an interesting concept, especially when you realize that the whole movie to that point has been her book, fictionalizing the story. It's not the most satisfying ending though, but than again look at No Country.... Was it some sort of trend this year?
Re: I drink your milkshake!
Date: 2008-02-25 03:28 pm (UTC)The no-ending thing is so lame. I mean, yeah, you can spot the endings of Juno and Michael Clayton a mile off, but that's no excuse to approve any movie that ended before any conclusion at all could be reached.
Re: I drink your milkshake!
Date: 2008-02-26 01:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-24 06:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-25 06:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-25 06:46 am (UTC)