trinityvixen: (thinking Mario)
[personal profile] trinityvixen
...is 2.66GHz really that much better than 2.4? As in at leat $200 better?

Date: 2008-07-18 03:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cagexxx.livejournal.com
Not by itself, especially not if you're not doing any processor-intensive things like video editing. However, an increase in the speed of the front-side bus (FSB) or the size of the L2 cache can make a heftier difference.

Still, assuming you're already getting a Core 2 Duo, unless you really need the extra boost, I find that it's usually best to go for the sweet spot on price for a computer that is going to gradually become obsolete anyway. So I would stay at 2.4.

I would also run any computer purchase you're about to make by your good friend Jordan so he can make sure you're getting a good deal. :P

Date: 2008-07-18 06:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] slackwench.livejournal.com
I agree, except that you probably don't need the cache and the FSB speed isn't really going to make much difference unless you use a lot of peripherals (especially at the same time).

Date: 2008-07-18 07:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] trinityvixen.livejournal.com
I'm considering getting an iMac. There aren't too many versions of it, just minor things to adjust and price is just never going to work in my favor, but I'd love to have your opinion all the same.

(I'm getting a desktop, btw.)

Date: 2008-07-18 10:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ecmyers.livejournal.com
BTW, have you tried out the Mac keyboards yet? Me no like.

Date: 2008-07-20 05:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] trinityvixen.livejournal.com
The really flat ones? They seemed awesome!

Profile

trinityvixen: (Default)
trinityvixen

February 2015

S M T W T F S
1234567
89 1011121314
15161718192021
22232425 262728

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 30th, 2026 08:20 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios