And now a post with even LESS substance!
Sep. 3rd, 2008 12:34 pmI'm thoroughly convinced that they were less plotted out than the worse seasons of Battlestar Galactica, LOST, and The X-FIles combined. This is the still the "oooh, look, we have plooooot" stage of shooting television. It's still an essentially episodic show with the ongoing "plot" hanging on the ends. The episodic stuff is ridiculously bad--the new version of The Outer Limits bad, Tales From The Crypt-but-taking-itself-seriously bad, bad-guys-always-confessing-on-CSI bad.
The frame story, though, is really fun. The shadowy Center group trying to reclaim their lost prize project, said prize project fucking around and making them crazy, politics at the Center changing the game a little. Mostly, I love Ms. Parker. She's a stone-cold bitch, and I love her. They keep trying to humanize her with the murder of her mother, her dependence on Daddy, that sort of thing, but where she really shines is in being a cold-hearted psycho cunt. I mean that in a good way, I actually do.
Some kids thump into her while tearing wild. Ms. Parker: "Where's Planned Parenthood when you need them?" Yes, she made a birth control/abortion joke. I LOVE HER. A bunch of the Center people are being grilled about who shot the head dude; everyone vacillates, but Ms. Parker goes, "Oh yeah, I would have shot him, sure. But I wouldn't have missed." Naturally, she is so intimidating, just about everyone believes her.
Psycho cunts for the win!!!
no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 05:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 05:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 05:42 pm (UTC)Also, there's is lots of hot in this show. Yum.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 05:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 05:34 pm (UTC)Also, they're going to do this "Oh, look at what quaint little custom/practice Jarod isn't familiar with" every episode, aren't they? I mean, I could understand when it was sex, but it's getting a tad retarded. (Actually, anyone growing to adulthood with ZERO concept of sexual desire is a stupid idea, too.) Yes, I buy him not knowing about Halloween, but he hardly seems a genius in his amused reactions. More, a slightly dim, humorless uncle or something.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 05:40 pm (UTC)Jarod is a bizarre character. He's a weird genius man-child who dresses in black leather and yet single women and small children are not afraid when he approaches them. I love Jarod, but he's one of those characters that I just sort of accept is nutso. Like Bruce Wayne. (Also, like Bruce Wayne, he is hot. Have you seen the eyeliner episode yet?)
I haven't read much of the fic, but it's not surprising almost all of it is about Miss Parker. Not just because of the character's appeal, I think, but because it's really fucking hard to write Jarod.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 07:11 pm (UTC)I find Jarod okay-looking generally, but there was that one episode where he had on wire-frame glasses and a suit with a vest. Yeah, I'd hit that. Otherwise, he's moderately attractive but his voice does nothing for me. (It sounds weird in some way, almost pubertal in the way it goes from light to heavy as he talks.) I did have the same reaction--why do people always trust Jarod!?--but I got really creeped out by it in the episode where he pays some woman to let him stalk her to see what that's like. Okaaaaaayyy...
It would be funny if most Pretender-fic were about Miss Parker. It would be one of the few fandoms that weren't predominantly female where the female character was the more popular one (to write about). I think you're right: it's too hard to strike the right balance of genius/idiot with Jarod to write him. (Though, if memory serves, I really liked your piece way back when.)
no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 08:02 pm (UTC)I think The Pretender is another case of the creators thinking they're writing one type of character but actually writing another. Jarod is, let's face it, wish fulfilment. He does everything better than everyone else, he's brilliant, he always wins in the end, he gets to not only play with all the cool toys (how many stuntman/race car driver episodes do we need? Not to mention the several gigolo episodes), but he also gets to exact the kind of deeply satisfying revenge on people that is completely unacceptable socially. But by giving him all of that, and the freedom to act on his impulses without inhibitions, they've made him a really deeply frightening person. I mean, you better hope he likes you, cause if he doesn't, jesus fuck you're screwed.
Not to mention the way he toys with Miss Parker. This is mostly a consequence of the way the show was written, making things up as they go along, stringing things out, but Jarod is really this evil puppet master who doesn't allow Miss Parker or Sydney to leave the Centre and get on with their lives.
The one type of episode I don't think they ever did, which I, of course, would have loved, is one where Jarod is completely wrong. Where he psychologically tortures an innocent person into a confession and only realizes later. Because the only thing that makes him heroic is that he's so smart he's never wrong.
We will have to talk more about Miss Parker later...
no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 08:15 pm (UTC)They are very sadistic. Almost every single one features him putting someone into a situation where they think they're going to die, usually horribly. Rewrite Jarod as a bad guy, and this is the plot of the Saw movies (essentially, death traps as teaching tools). The one where he buried the guy a little so that he could think he was being buried alive? S.I.C.K.
Yes, Jarod is a wish-fulfiller--he's just MacGuyver with more set-up time and supplies. For that reason, they could never do the episode you propose because it would be like writing a Batman comic (post the first run in the 1930s) where he killed a criminal. With a gun. Part of the wish-fulfillment impulse is the idea that near-fascist, anti-social or downright psychotic behavior can be pulled back. Jarod is wicked determined to make someone suffer but only until they confess and then the law takes over. (Ditto Batman.) While we like this very much in fiction, most of us have a healthy enough understanding of humanity that we know there is no way anyone would manage not to go completely nuts from this sort of behavior. (There are no benevolent dictators.) Showing Jarod's methods to be questionable instead of successful would raise the spectre of reality, and that would be out of place in such a fantastical realm as Jarod inhabits.
Yes, more about Ms. Parker. I love her!
no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 05:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 07:15 pm (UTC)Ms. Parker. She even have a first name? Or would you dare not use it for fear of an ass-kicking? I mean, they even call her Ms. when the evil Centre bad-guy is just referred to by his last name. That's bad-ass. She also wears this consciously dark shade of lipstick which somehow really, really works for her. It's not red, it's just a dark pink-purple so that it's clearly lipstick but I can't possibly imagine her with normal-colored lips and that's what color I think hers are.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 07:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 07:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 08:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 08:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 08:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 08:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 08:07 pm (UTC)Anyway…
On it they said they deliberately gave every character only one name. Jarod, Sydney, Broots, Raines, Miss Parker. It's meant to be some kind of post-modern representation of the fragmentation of the character's identities or some such, so no, Miss Parker does not have a first name.
It was actually an argument over this point that led me to leaving the Pretender yahoo group, but that's another story…
Also, you do realize this is by the same people who brought you Tin Man, right?
no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 08:21 pm (UTC)I think it also lends importance to relationships. Notably, Ms. Parker's referencing of her parents solely by "my mother" or "Daddy." (Which, in their different levels of formality, are a psychological minefield of their own.) Jarod's relationship to Sydney is strengthened and made both artificially and genuinely loving by the idea that they are on a one-name basis. Conversely, a name like Broots, which is clearly a family name, can convey distance and subordination (he's Broots, she's Ms. Parker; if someone wanted to turn that around, they could really insult Ms. Parker by just calling her "Parker"). I don't know jack about "postmodernism" but I do see the dramatic effectiveness of the results of the one-name system (combined with the restricted use of signatory epithets).
Also, you do realize this is by the same people who brought you Tin Man, right?
Suddenly, the lack of cohesion makes so much more sense! No, really? Faaabulous. So the good parts on top of the nonsensical is a theme of theirs, is it?