Hadn't heard this before
Sep. 3rd, 2008 05:00 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
trinityvixenI did know about the lawsuit that might hold up The Watchmen movie, but I hadn't heard one little hitch in that until this NYT article:
In a summary of its position in Friday’s report, Warner said Fox “sat silently” as one of the producers of “Watchmen,” Lawrence Gordon, took the project “to studio after studio with Fox’s express knowledge.”
The basic story is that Fox bought the rights to the graphic novel, sat on it forever because it seemed an impossible movie to make, then let it go. It found a production company and money and director and writer over at Warner Brothers. They've all but made the movie (pricinple photography is done), and now Fox is screaming about the movie being stolen from them. Specifically, that some part of how they let their ownership of the property slip wasn't a total release and therefore they needed to be a) entirely bought off or b) involved in any production.
What's notable for me about that quote is that it seems very improbable, near impossible that Fox would have gone even as long as San Diego Comic Con 2008, where The Watchmen trailer and panels debuted without knowing that Warner was making a film based on this property. There's just no way. If the internet knew since way back when Zack Snyder was doing 300, Fox had to have known.
The fact that they let Warner sink a bajillion dollar into the thing and then went about legal action is incredibly bad form. It basically looks like Fox studio execs thought "Wow, this is going to be way too expensive to make, but it could be a really big hit if it gets made. Let's let some other studio make it and absorb the costs and then we'll sue them! We spend nothing, we get free money!" That's incredibly shit behavior. Of course, legally speaking, they're probably within their rights to do so. (I doubt they have to prove that they didn't know someone else was making a movie with their licensed property until now to win their case.) And Warner Bros. execs are fools for not being 100% certain they had all the legal ownership of this potential cash-cow nailed down. Still, shitty form, Fox. (I know, same old, same old, right?)
In a summary of its position in Friday’s report, Warner said Fox “sat silently” as one of the producers of “Watchmen,” Lawrence Gordon, took the project “to studio after studio with Fox’s express knowledge.”
The basic story is that Fox bought the rights to the graphic novel, sat on it forever because it seemed an impossible movie to make, then let it go. It found a production company and money and director and writer over at Warner Brothers. They've all but made the movie (pricinple photography is done), and now Fox is screaming about the movie being stolen from them. Specifically, that some part of how they let their ownership of the property slip wasn't a total release and therefore they needed to be a) entirely bought off or b) involved in any production.
What's notable for me about that quote is that it seems very improbable, near impossible that Fox would have gone even as long as San Diego Comic Con 2008, where The Watchmen trailer and panels debuted without knowing that Warner was making a film based on this property. There's just no way. If the internet knew since way back when Zack Snyder was doing 300, Fox had to have known.
The fact that they let Warner sink a bajillion dollar into the thing and then went about legal action is incredibly bad form. It basically looks like Fox studio execs thought "Wow, this is going to be way too expensive to make, but it could be a really big hit if it gets made. Let's let some other studio make it and absorb the costs and then we'll sue them! We spend nothing, we get free money!" That's incredibly shit behavior. Of course, legally speaking, they're probably within their rights to do so. (I doubt they have to prove that they didn't know someone else was making a movie with their licensed property until now to win their case.) And Warner Bros. execs are fools for not being 100% certain they had all the legal ownership of this potential cash-cow nailed down. Still, shitty form, Fox. (I know, same old, same old, right?)
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 09:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-04 05:06 am (UTC)