Diminishing Returns
Mar. 17th, 2009 05:55 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
As this season of Supernatural has gone along, I've not missed the anvil-laden clues that, well, the apocalypse is coming. For real and for true. All the Winchesters have died at this point, so since we have no other heroes on this show, it's time to literally F up the planet in order to generate suspense/anticipation. So, okay, bring on biblical armageddon.
Except, what do you do for an encore? It's already been established that the show will be on for at least another year. As it became clearer that they were heading to a literal Heaven vs Hell showdown and dropping the Winchesters in the middle, straddling the divide (huh, huh, straddling / pervert), I kept coming back to this question of how one tops the apocalypse. Buffy managed to keep creating apocalypses (skewered in a blase and awesome fashion in song from "Once More With Feeling"), but it's the sort of thing that definitely puts you in a position of diminishing returns. To continue the Buffy analogy, surviving graduation = amazing! Dealing with Adam and the army guys = meh. And it was "meh" only corrected by having Buffy herself die in the next season--the ultimate end to a series being the death of its protagonist. The exploration beyond the death of the protagonist was okay, but not great. It could be interesting, but it frequently isn't, and you're right back to "well, why should I be worried? Buffy came back before..."
So, Supernatural. The apocalypse to end all apocalypses is coming. You don't really get much bigger. What to do, then, to justify another year? While we can accept that the Winchesters, when they win (and they will, for a given value of "winning"), will go back to doing what they've always done, it's not really narratively satisfying. That would be a season of aimless wanderings leading to a face-off with that season's Big Bad, regular as clockwork. It still pales in comparison with armageddon.
I didn't have answer to the question of "What now?" until last night. Uriel's betrayal of heaven was not unexpected. If you've seen one angel-gone-bad plot, you've seen 'em all. The second an angel starts calling humans "monkeys," it's a foregone conclusion that he/she/it is not on the side of the...well, angels. However, this was the first time that I've seen an angel break ranks with Heaven in favor of Lucifer. Whatever their issues with God's preference for humanity, most renegade angels in fiction never really want Lucifer back in power or on their side; they're in it for themselves (no matter how they pretend to cloak themselves in righteousness). Uriel is making a very sympathetic, almost human sort of stand against the "natural" order here by defying Heaven to rescue his brother--not unlike what Sam attempted to do for Dean. (And that Dean successfully did for Sam.)
What does this have to do with narrative structure (apart from the lovely symmetry)? Well, maybe I'm just slow, but it dawned on me last night that the show isn't going to stop the apocalypse. I defend my slowness with the evidence that, despite numerous mini-disasters climaxing at the end of the season, the Winchesters always avoid the worst sort of disaster. The Yellow-Eyed Demon does not get the sons to kill their father in season one. The Yellow-Eyed Demon is killed at the end of season two. Lilith is not able to kill Sam at the end of season three. There are consequences to all the victories, of course (S1's car crash leading to the exchange of John for Dean; S2's exchange of Dean for Sam; S3's killing Dean and sending him to Hell), but the major disaster doesn't happen. The heroes, for lack of a better word, "win." (Again, for a given value of "winning.")
So there are three ways this season can play out. One: Lilith fails to open all the seals, is defeated, the world is saved. (Thanks to the Powerpuff...er, Winchester Boys.) I would feel a little cheated there, but it wouldn't be all that bad. (Because the apocalypse didn't happen, it could always happen later when the show does want to end.) Two: Lilith opens all the seals, but Lucifer and she are defeated. That's fine; what the fuck do you do for season five?
Or Three: end with Lucifer escaping and have it be the sort of Rapture-long apocalypse that the Left Behind sort are always assuming will happen. Apocalypses don't have to happen overnight! Lucifer can be the Big Bad to come of season five, when, hopefully, the brother-on-brother violence will have been over and dealt with. (As should, rightfully, be the continued focus of this season.)
Except, what do you do for an encore? It's already been established that the show will be on for at least another year. As it became clearer that they were heading to a literal Heaven vs Hell showdown and dropping the Winchesters in the middle, straddling the divide (huh, huh, straddling / pervert), I kept coming back to this question of how one tops the apocalypse. Buffy managed to keep creating apocalypses (skewered in a blase and awesome fashion in song from "Once More With Feeling"), but it's the sort of thing that definitely puts you in a position of diminishing returns. To continue the Buffy analogy, surviving graduation = amazing! Dealing with Adam and the army guys = meh. And it was "meh" only corrected by having Buffy herself die in the next season--the ultimate end to a series being the death of its protagonist. The exploration beyond the death of the protagonist was okay, but not great. It could be interesting, but it frequently isn't, and you're right back to "well, why should I be worried? Buffy came back before..."
So, Supernatural. The apocalypse to end all apocalypses is coming. You don't really get much bigger. What to do, then, to justify another year? While we can accept that the Winchesters, when they win (and they will, for a given value of "winning"), will go back to doing what they've always done, it's not really narratively satisfying. That would be a season of aimless wanderings leading to a face-off with that season's Big Bad, regular as clockwork. It still pales in comparison with armageddon.
I didn't have answer to the question of "What now?" until last night. Uriel's betrayal of heaven was not unexpected. If you've seen one angel-gone-bad plot, you've seen 'em all. The second an angel starts calling humans "monkeys," it's a foregone conclusion that he/she/it is not on the side of the...well, angels. However, this was the first time that I've seen an angel break ranks with Heaven in favor of Lucifer. Whatever their issues with God's preference for humanity, most renegade angels in fiction never really want Lucifer back in power or on their side; they're in it for themselves (no matter how they pretend to cloak themselves in righteousness). Uriel is making a very sympathetic, almost human sort of stand against the "natural" order here by defying Heaven to rescue his brother--not unlike what Sam attempted to do for Dean. (And that Dean successfully did for Sam.)
What does this have to do with narrative structure (apart from the lovely symmetry)? Well, maybe I'm just slow, but it dawned on me last night that the show isn't going to stop the apocalypse. I defend my slowness with the evidence that, despite numerous mini-disasters climaxing at the end of the season, the Winchesters always avoid the worst sort of disaster. The Yellow-Eyed Demon does not get the sons to kill their father in season one. The Yellow-Eyed Demon is killed at the end of season two. Lilith is not able to kill Sam at the end of season three. There are consequences to all the victories, of course (S1's car crash leading to the exchange of John for Dean; S2's exchange of Dean for Sam; S3's killing Dean and sending him to Hell), but the major disaster doesn't happen. The heroes, for lack of a better word, "win." (Again, for a given value of "winning.")
So there are three ways this season can play out. One: Lilith fails to open all the seals, is defeated, the world is saved. (Thanks to the Powerpuff...er, Winchester Boys.) I would feel a little cheated there, but it wouldn't be all that bad. (Because the apocalypse didn't happen, it could always happen later when the show does want to end.) Two: Lilith opens all the seals, but Lucifer and she are defeated. That's fine; what the fuck do you do for season five?
Or Three: end with Lucifer escaping and have it be the sort of Rapture-long apocalypse that the Left Behind sort are always assuming will happen. Apocalypses don't have to happen overnight! Lucifer can be the Big Bad to come of season five, when, hopefully, the brother-on-brother violence will have been over and dealt with. (As should, rightfully, be the continued focus of this season.)
no subject
Date: 2009-03-20 09:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-20 09:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-20 09:30 pm (UTC)That's not to say that Dean isn't, ultimately, there to stop Sam. Castiel has said that Dean needs to restrain Sam from embracing his demon-derived abilities. Dean has, as a result of being messed up about his own issues, pretty much failed spectacularly at that. What Castiel and Alistair pointed out last night about Dean having started this process for Lilith and him being the one who has to stop it suggests to me that he's going to have to throw himself on the grenade in the end, and I bet Sam will be the one who's charged to explode (and somehow bust Lucifer out as a result). I just don't think that Sam will be literally possessed by Lucifer.
I think we're definitely headed for a Sam vs. Dean showdown. I think, as currently stands, such a showdown should be employed to the supra-narrative of Lucifer. As in, the showdown will happen this season to set up Lucifer's reign next season, and it's not that Sam won't be a baddie but that his rise is the false climax and Lucifer's is the authentic one.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-20 09:24 pm (UTC)Same reason they can't out-do the apocalypse: diminishing returns. Drag out the seal-breaking for too long, you lose people. They've already lost the thread of the seal-breaking with having every other episode be more or less just a write-off comedic episode. By the time we catch up with the serious episodes, umpteen more seals have been broken zomg! I think they're going to let Lucifer out but not let him run amok just yet.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-20 09:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-20 10:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-20 10:19 pm (UTC)I would not be happy with them having entirely separate storylines next season. The show's a lot less interesting when they don't share screen time. I don't want another Farscape with two separate ships and clones of the main character. :)
no subject
Date: 2009-03-21 05:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-20 10:15 pm (UTC)I'm sort of assuming that we won't get the end of that arc this year, since they know they've got another season to play with. Kripke has always said he had a five-year plan for the show. I don't think we should assume that either the brother vs. brother dynamic will be resolved or that the apocalypse will be averted this year.
The only reason, I think, we got such a neat ending to season 2, tying up the YED storyline, was because the show wasn't renewed until after that episode aired. And Kripke, unlike so many showrunners, decided that if this was the end, he was going to let it go out with some resolution for the fans.
I also worry about diminishing returns, but so far SPN has avoided it. I thought there was no way they could top last season's ending, but this season they've really brought it on. Heck, I thought the same at the end of seasons one and two (though I don't think they quite pulled off season three, for a lot of reasons). It is a completely different show now than it was when it started, but I'm still loving it.
I've always kind of assumed that these guys won't get a happy ending. Even in season one, it didn't look that way. At this point, I think the best way it could end is with both of them going out in a blaze of glory.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-21 05:39 am (UTC)Season three's ending is what really got me worried about diminishing returns. Because I really had a hard time imagining how that would be topped. (Not only was it tragic and dramatic, but it was plain devastating in how brutal it was.) The apocalypse would do it, but I don't see how you can drag it out for two seasons or solve it and then move onto something new. I'm still not sure.
I'm reasonably certain that they'll get there okay, if that's any consolation.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-21 02:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-21 02:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-21 08:54 pm (UTC)Minus the part where
no subject
Date: 2009-03-23 03:19 am (UTC)