trinityvixen: (thinking Mario)
[personal profile] trinityvixen
What could we do about the marriage practice of changing one spouse's last name (usually the wife's) to the other's that would make the practice a) entirely gender-independent and b) practical for multiple generations?

The best I can figure is that both partners have to change their name in some fashion. Either they would do it upon marrying--John Doe and Jane Smith would pick or be given third, new name, say "Brown"--or they would keep their names but give any children a new one.

That would certainly fulfill requirement a), but I'm still not sure that it's an attractive solution to the problem of b). Unless the parents took the new name and passed that on, having children with a different name from the parents is awkward and inelegant.

What do you all think?

Oh, and please, bear in mind that issues of being able to track genealogy are lesser concerns to me. We live in an age with adequate resources for tracking down that sort of information if you want to build family trees. I don't think "being able to trace/link back to our ancestors" is an effective argument against adopting a new system of nomenclature. Issues of how couples would choose new names are fair game though. I imagine we'd get plenty of crank names as the internet generations get married, to say nothing about the few folk who would expose their ignorance and/or bigotry by appropriating names from cultures not their own (or enhancing their link to diluted bloodlines with usurpation of old names).

Date: 2009-03-27 12:11 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] trinityvixen.livejournal.com
I don't think that's so. I think it would strengthen the family unit. They wouldn't be one or another family, they would be their own. If the nuclear family is our (current) ideal for a family, we should celebrate any efforts to ensure its stability and independence, right?

Date: 2009-03-27 05:07 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] slackwench.livejournal.com
My mother and I do not share a last name (she didn't change hers). I don't feel any less close to her than I would if we shared a name.

Date: 2009-03-27 02:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] trinityvixen.livejournal.com
And I don't doubt that that's a similar impression that others have as well. But for the sake of ease? I'd say having everyone have the same name is damn useful (as others have pointed out above).

Profile

trinityvixen: (Default)
trinityvixen

February 2015

S M T W T F S
1234567
89 1011121314
15161718192021
22232425 262728

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 13th, 2025 02:09 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios