trinityvixen: (epic fail)
[personal profile] trinityvixen
It looks like I was right. I blogged about this before, but this really slam dunks the case I was trying to make in a much, much shorter format.

I'd also like to point out the disproportionate loss of women of color from that map. Every season, you lose at least one female character, usually the non-white female character. They tried to compensate, it seems, by putting in two new female characters in, but one of them always leaves and the others are now all white.

The issue of women on this show is a sore one for me. Every season has, in a list of 11-13 central characters, only 4 female characters AT MOST. Of those four, only two have been around since season one, if you fudge the matter and count Ali Larter as being continuous even though her characters have not been. That's a serious imbalance before you begin to consider how marginalized the women in this list are. The three remaining in the fourth season play the very definite roles of maiden, mother, crone, too. Which helps immensely, let me tell you.

Someone remind me why I watch this again?

Date: 2009-12-03 03:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] saturn-shumba.livejournal.com
I admire you sticking to Heroes, actually. Your insights are needed--everyone needs to know why that show is bad, as the badness of the show is much deeper than "Wow, that sucks." For example, that chart. And the women. And the fact that Claire's whole existence is defined by how men protect/attack her.

Although...Adrian Pasdar is actually half white/half Iranian. I don't know if that really matters, but as someone who is also biracial (my Mom is Filipino), I think it's important to point out. Although ironically, Pasdar is also getting killed off.

Date: 2009-12-03 05:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] trinityvixen.livejournal.com
everyone needs to know why that show is bad, as the badness of the show is much deeper than "Wow, that sucks."

I think this is right. It's one thing to dislike a thing that's poorly made in any way or that's not to your taste. It's another to just dismiss it when it's putting into prime time this "people of color go first" and "women suck" message into the ether.

I note, too, that women don't kill on this show. Claire's ability is to be killed. Jessica killed some, but always offscreen. It might just as well have been the Boogey Man. Tracey, Elle, too. Maya killed people, but only because she was a silly woman who couldn't keep her ability under control! Men butcher each other every other episode. Women? Nope, too gentle (or subtle) to do it overtly. Their powers, too, are typically defensive, or, if not, are used defensively. It's all about women being under assault. ALL THE TIME. Not cool.

Although...Adrian Pasdar is actually half white/half Iranian. I don't know if that really matters, but as someone who is also biracial (my Mom is Filipino), I think it's important to point out. Although ironically, Pasdar is also getting killed off.

This is an important point, and thanks for bringing it up. Obviously, Pasdar is playing white in this. Technically, he's playing Italian-American, which, in America, reads as white even though it's not Anglo-Saxon. But since the show never handled that as if it were distinctive from the lily-white Bennets or Matt Parkman, it's hard to bring in Pasdar's lineage when discussing this.

I would also add that while it's easy to kill him off (and should have been done and over with ages ago), the only other characters currently as useless as Nathan are persons of color: Hiro (and, if Hiro were to go, Ando) and Mohinder. What that indicates about Heroes is that they not only easily knock off men and women of color, they assign the lamest plot lines to the characters of color that stick around. It's as roundly insulting as Claire's story line ever has been.

Date: 2009-12-03 01:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] saturn-shumba.livejournal.com
they assign the lamest plot lines to the characters of color that stick around

Ugh, that is so true. Hiro is especially depressing to me. Yes, his plotline has always been the lighthearted one of the group, but in Season One, he still had a goal and he still accomplished it (awesomely, I might add). But in later seasons they've seem to have forgotten that Hiro can (and was) more than the comic relief hero. In a way, I think that his tumor (or whatever it is, I don't follow the show too closely) was an attempt to make his storyline more serious...and it's failing.
From: [identity profile] hslayer.livejournal.com
Okay, I wasn't going to chime in when all I had to say was, "Who cares?" but this is a point I always have to wonder about. The "murder is good" point. I've heard feminists make it and I've heard feminists refute it. Personally, it's not a point I understand. Yes, I understand that the ability (and willingness?) to kill has a relation to power, but it is the 21st century here, not the 11th. It could just as easily be argued that they're depicting men as violent homicidal monsters who'll kill with the slightest provocation, which is also not cool. I'm not making that argument, because I think it would be absurd given the context, but the logic (and perhaps the absurdity, but that's clearly more subjective) is exactly analogous to that of your argument.

I'll also note that although Italian-American equals white in America to you, it has been noted by Italian-American groups that they are almost exclusively portrayed in media as either mafiosi or cops (Heroes, actually, being an exception, so yay for cultural awareness there).

I guess my main point is that you can find (or manufacture) stereotyping anywhere if you look hard enough. I mean, the highest-rated show in America, the loathsome Dancing With the Stars, was whiter than Heroes last season (count them yourself on abc.com if you want, but for the sake of your sanity mute your PC before going there). Does that mean something ominous or is it just a thing that happened? I tend to think it falls into the latter category, as does nearly every event in the history of the world. When the pile of things you've dropped into category one grows overlarge, you're a conspiracy theorist.
From: [identity profile] trinityvixen.livejournal.com
I'm not making that argument, because I think it would be absurd given the context, but the logic (and perhaps the absurdity, but that's clearly more subjective) is exactly analogous to that of your argument.

It's a fair point--men are consequently portrayed as being more violent than women when they're the only ones allowed to exert violent power. However, in Heroes case, several men can be violent without rendering them monsters. The point I was making was just that we give men the benefit of the doubt--we can make up our own minds whether or not what they did was justified. We just don't get that chance with the female characters since a) there are hardly any that ever even defend themselves, to say nothing of attacking anyone and b) all the women who have killed are immediately villainesses forever.

I'll also note that although Italian-American equals white in America to you, it has been noted by Italian-American groups that they are almost exclusively portrayed in media as either mafiosi or cops (Heroes, actually, being an exception, so yay for cultural awareness there).

Another good point. I agree that stereotypically, this is true. I guess in terms of non-mafioso Italian-American families on TV, they tend to read as white. And this is all a spectrum, obviously. Some people are more "of color" than others. It's just funny that they play the Petrellis as white (and they do--there are no mafia jokes about them, for all that they seem to run things that way at time) and yet Adrian Pasdar is half Iranian...

As for popularity contests, I can't figure out what point you're making with Dancing with the Stars. Is it sexist and retrograde in some way that should alarm me? Is it just stupid?
From: [identity profile] hslayer.livejournal.com
Bringing up DWTS (which I chose only because it is, sadly, the highest-rated at the moment) was more in response to the assertion you made in reply to [livejournal.com profile] ecmyers that this whitewashing (or whatever you choose to call it) alienates potential viewers. Clearly other things (though again in the case of DWTS, I couldn't begin to fathom what things) are more important to most viewers.

Profile

trinityvixen: (Default)
trinityvixen

February 2015

S M T W T F S
1234567
89 1011121314
15161718192021
22232425 262728

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 30th, 2026 02:43 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios