trinityvixen: (blogging from work)
[personal profile] trinityvixen
It has been an exceedingly busy day at work, and I've got about twenty minutes of downtime to share a few things. You will not be surprised to learn they are mostly about movies.

1. Bucky Barnes has a promo still from Captain America. You may be forgiven if you don't spot him right away. (You are also forgiven if you have no idea who he is.) He's not at the center of the still. (Chris Evans, playing the Cap, is.) He's definitely not wearing his, ahem, old uniform. In fact, the only way to tell he's of any more significance than the other dudes standing around in WWII costume who are not the Cap is that he is facing the camera. I think that article title--"Nobody Cares About Bucky"--probably extends to the person choosing stills to release to the press.

2. Unlike most theories about the state of contemporary cinema, this one may be correct. Although I still take issue with the hyperbolic use of the words "death spiral" to describe things, it stands to reason that there's a supply and demand issue with movies. The demand for movies has not ebbed, it has shifted past what the suppliers are able to, financially, provide in the manner to which they had become accustomed. I'm not entirely sure how the studios will handle this shift, either, because there's no way Netflix is going away. Hell, Netflix could double its subscription fees, and I guarantee their business would be fine. (Pretend you didn't hear that, PLZ, Netflix!) People have found a solution that works for them that is legal, and they'll be loath to part from it easily. The 28-day release window that Netflix has hasn't hurt them at all. If they made it a 45-day window, I bet no one would notice. My queue is so long, they could make it a 5-year window, and I bet I wouldn't notice.

This is all relevant to my interests as someone who is not only not on trend, as far as seeing movies is concerned, but who is actively bucking it by making the effort to give Hollywood all of my money. I will continue to go see movies in the theater. I may be slightly less inclined to part with my money after I complete this zany screening schedule for a year, but I'll still always like the theater experience. It's a shame that it's turned off so many others. But I do understand their point. It's the studios' move.

3. The only coherent thing I can say about Egypt is this: It is not about you. That goes for Americans, that goes for Europeans, that goes for the various groups all holding their breath to see who will come out on top. Coverage has been mostly atrocious on this side of the pond, though I do think that Rachel Maddow's coverage has been more thoughtful than most. Her tack has been to not pigeonhole the demonstrators so much as to understand the long game of a revolution as one happens. I appreciate that.

Date: 2011-02-04 09:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ivy03.livejournal.com
I find it interesting that in American coverage, the protesters are "anti-Mubarak." On Al Jazeera, they're "pro-democracy."

The two bits I found most interesting from today's news:
- Iraqi refugees are fleeing back to Iraq. On Al Jazeera, they also interviewed people in Baghdad, who were watching coverage intently, as their own people's uprising in 1991 led to them being gunned down. One man said democracy is better when it comes from the people. And boy, doesn't that carry a wealth of bitterness and regret.

- At Friday prayers today, Coptic Christians formed a human wall around Muslims praying in Tahrir Square. Same thing happened in Alexandria. Given that just a month ago a Coptic church was bombed in Alexandria, this is just overwhelming for me. Today's events have made me feel, perhaps unjustifiably, a little more hopeful about Egypt's future.

Date: 2011-02-04 09:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] trinityvixen.livejournal.com
Frankly, they need to agree on one term for the protesters. The BBC podcast people keep on having to correct themselves because they'll say anti or pro some group and have to correct it because they're actually anti (or pro) someone/thing else.

As I understood it, the Egyptians were generally aghast at the bombing of the church. There's at least some respect there for the antiquity of the thing even if the religion is not as welcome. When the bombing happened, Muslims in the area were very supportive of their Coptic Christian neighbors. It's nice to see that that generosity is being returned in kind.

Date: 2011-02-04 09:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ivy03.livejournal.com
Also, Al Jazeera has a site up where Americans can email their cable companies and demand Al Jazeera. There are also meet ups, but I don't think I'm quite that enthusiastic.

The thing is I don't watch news on a regular basis, but Al Jazeera has far and away had the best coverage of this. And if I actually do want to see what's happening, I'm not going to watch any of America's cable companies.

Date: 2011-02-04 09:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] trinityvixen.livejournal.com
Al Jazeera does good work. I've often relied more heavily on their reports (not televised ones, but reportage otherwise) as accurate where necessary. They're very reliable.

Date: 2011-02-04 11:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] oblvndrgn.livejournal.com
Movies are probably getting too expensive. You can make a lot of things more expensive as time goes on because quality goes up and people will pay more for it. Product development 101, yeah? But movies are getting more and more expensive and not necessarily any better. 3D just makes some people dizzy. Studios need to either cut costs (stop hiring actors that demand too much money, maybe?) or something, and so far the something is 'concentrate on making money from merch like DVDs and international releases.'

I started seeing Netflix movies that are rental-only; they have the movie but no bonus features. I think that's a totally acceptable compromise. I don't mind losing deleted scenes and bonus features from my Netflix rentals if it means I might get movies sooner. It gives some kind of reason to buy the physical object instead of renting anyway. I could see people who love both extra features and rentals being annoyed though.

Date: 2011-02-05 04:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] trinityvixen.livejournal.com
Studios need to either cut costs (stop hiring actors that demand too much money, maybe?) or something, and so far the something is 'concentrate on making money from merch like DVDs and international releases.'

The cost of making movies has ballooned, yes, but a lot of that is because of the unions. Don't get me wrong, I'm pro-union, but these unions are operating in a town where so much money is being tossed around and each one definitely demands its slice of the pie. Actors are pricey, it's true, but even they can't account for the ballooning costs.

I started seeing Netflix movies that are rental-only; they have the movie but no bonus features. I think that's a totally acceptable compromise. I don't mind losing deleted scenes and bonus features from my Netflix rentals if it means I might get movies sooner. It gives some kind of reason to buy the physical object instead of renting anyway. I could see people who love both extra features and rentals being annoyed though.

I am not someone who watches special features and I find "rental-only" copies OBNOXIOUS. It's funny. I just watched the first season of Being Human downloaded--so no special features--and I was fine. The second I took out the DVD for the second season, I was annoyed to find it was a rental only copy. I get why Netflix would do it--as they've risen in power, they've had to make compromises to keep their DVDs coming in. But this won't make me buy something I don't want to. It just annoys me with the studio that insisted on the stripped-down DVD more.

Profile

trinityvixen: (Default)
trinityvixen

February 2015

S M T W T F S
1234567
89 1011121314
15161718192021
22232425 262728

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 29th, 2026 10:09 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios