trinityvixen: (Default)
[personal profile] trinityvixen
I hope my friends and the internet won't crucify me for saying it, but I didn't really like Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2. Look, I had low expectations. Every Harry Potter movie has been okay. They're not as good as the books ever, and I'm okay with that. The movies did have the potential, however, to do Rowling one better, especially the later movies, since they had the chance to go and add things to make up for the fact that she did not do that and got all the way to book six without mentioning horcruxes. I'm sorry they didn't take the chance to improve where they could. Film is an incredibly potent medium for conveying devastating emotion. I didn't really feel anything, about any of the events in the movie. The last Harry Potter book made me cry. This last Harry Potter film made me indifferent.

More than anything, the second movie felt like an unnecessary cash-grab instead of a movie that stood on its own. The first Deathly Hallows installment did have something of a climax and resolution structure and could, as much as any of the other movies in the series, stood on its own at least as well as the rest of them (so long as you assumed something else was coming). This one, in words of [livejournal.com profile] moonlightalice felt like just an extended climax, and a very anticlimactic one at that.

I assume that the positive responses I've seen are almost nostalgia/sentiment driven, not that there's anything wrong with that--you are free to enjoy it, and I'm glad some have. I just felt like it was a let down, and I hadn't really built up any hopes on it, so I didn't exactly have high expectations to crash. Unlike, say, the extreme level of hopes I have in Captain America, coming out this week. A preview trailer for The Avengers leaked, and I'm now doubly excited. Stupid hope, why do you have to spring eternal?

Date: 2011-07-18 06:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] xannoside.livejournal.com
I thought it was soundly "meh". Not awful, not great, but more or less solid.

If it weren't the finale, I wouldn't have minded quite as much.

Also, ticked that they made Neville's moment of awesome, well, decidedly less awesome, IMHO.

Date: 2011-07-18 06:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] trinityvixen.livejournal.com
If it weren't the finale, I wouldn't have minded quite as much.

That is probably why it feels like such a let down and why it most likely was never going to rise above low expectations. It's one thing to make a series of mostly okay movies, but it's a downer to end on just an okay note.

And you were not the only one bemoaning Neville's moment of awesome being decidedly dialed down.

Date: 2011-07-18 07:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shell524.livejournal.com
OMG yes. I was SO LOOKING FORWARD to Neville being totally freakin' awesome, and.... bleh.

Date: 2011-07-19 03:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] moonlightalice.livejournal.com
HE SHOULD HAVE BEEN ON FIRE WTF WHY WAS THERE A TEN MINUTE SNAKE HUNT INSTEAD

Profile

trinityvixen: (Default)
trinityvixen

February 2015

S M T W T F S
1234567
89 1011121314
15161718192021
22232425 262728

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 30th, 2026 01:13 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios