trinityvixen: (no sense)
[personal profile] trinityvixen
They WON? Fucking crybaby, worst-examples-of-the-sacrament-of-marriage SHITFUCKS won!?!

I, for one, would like to know how much it cost to change the forms back. And I'd like that bill delivered right to these spoiled shits. I want it taken out on both their heads. I want them to have a special law passed TODAY (it's not 5 yet in California) saying that these two fuckwad, taint-sniffing, turdblossoms STILL HAVE TO BE "PARTY A" AND "PARTY B." Teach those two a fucking lesson before they continue on much longer in this conservative, entitled delusion that so long as they stamp their feet and hold their breath they'll get what they want and FUCK everyone else. I say, let 'em hold pass out and hit their heads. Might knock some goddamned sense into these cockbangers.

Date: 2008-10-07 09:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] droidguy1119.livejournal.com
Okay, okay, so they're wrong, but I don't see the big deal. At least the revision they landed on is something that can easily appease everyone.

Date: 2008-10-07 09:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] trinityvixen.livejournal.com
Oh, it's a big deal, but not in the way they're assuming. They're a bunch of bigots who are so pissed that the gays getting married stole "bride" and "groom" from them. They blamed the gays when they were being stupid fucks who wouldn't get married until the entire State of California danced to their tune. Forget that gays couldn't get married--the heteros have to have their marriage be extra-super-special so that the gays know that they hate them.

There is an upside, as PZ Myers points out: sure, she can be "bride" on her form. So can every butch biker fag in California. Have fun being a bride, whore.

Date: 2008-10-07 10:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] droidguy1119.livejournal.com
That, I guess, is what I meant. The change allows either side, or both, to read "Bride" or "Groom".

Date: 2008-10-07 10:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chuckro.livejournal.com
"Couples filling out the license will now have the option of declaring themselves bride and groom, bride and bride or groom and groom. They can also leave the space blank."

So, no, they didn't win. The forms are replacing "Party A" and "Party B" with blanks. Which means that you could also be "Pimp" and "Ho", "Dude" and "Sweet", or "Master" and "Slave".

Date: 2008-10-07 10:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jendaby.livejournal.com
Actually, I don't think they can. I think they get to pick bride or groom for each person or else put in nothing at all. But these idiots already have the shirts telling them which is which, why do they need to put it on paper? I mean, now it is basically like saying "pick a gender indentifier or you're nothing."

But, of course, if the selfish brats who sued the state were intelligent, they would have realized, as you have stated, that they could refer to themselves as whatever the hell they like, and it matters not what the state forms say.
Edited Date: 2008-10-07 10:29 pm (UTC)

Date: 2008-10-07 11:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] droidguy1119.livejournal.com
I think they realize that. They just want it to say that anyway, regardless of whether or not it matters. That is what makes them selfish brats.

Date: 2008-10-08 01:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chuckro.livejournal.com
I think they get to pick bride or groom for each person or else put in nothing at all.

Which would be accurate if this was a computerized drop-down, but we're talking about a government form here, which means it's on paper. So unless it reads "Circle One: Bride Groom Blank", it's a blank space to be filled in.

"Captain" and "First Mate", "Jedi" and "Sith", "Pirate" and "Ninja"...the possibilities are endless.

Date: 2008-10-08 03:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] trinityvixen.livejournal.com
I could get behind this if those last ones were options. I'd totally pick "Sith."

Date: 2008-10-08 05:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wellgull.livejournal.com
This is reason #277618 that yours would be the most interesting wedding on record.

Date: 2008-10-08 02:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] trinityvixen.livejournal.com
SIth zombies? Forget about it! Surrender your brains and pray for the sweet release of death!

Date: 2008-10-07 10:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jendaby.livejournal.com
What selfish asshats! I have declared several times recently, and will now declare again: I despise selfish people who think they are entitled to whatever they want. If aliens invade Earth and decide that humans are good eats, I hope they take all of the self-serving fuckers who have never thought of anything but their own wants - all of those spoiled pricks out there - and gobble them up.

Date: 2008-10-08 03:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] trinityvixen.livejournal.com
Seriously, it would be lovely to let people choose their own monikers, it's just that I don't like that a couple of asshats got to complain and be listened to when human beings were asking for civil rights and are being demonized. Fuck that noise.

Date: 2008-10-08 02:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] moonlightalice.livejournal.com
Ugh, those people don't deserve the air they breathe, but I think the ultimate solution was a decent compromise. I like the blank idea!

Date: 2008-10-08 03:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] trinityvixen.livejournal.com
I am in favor of the blank. I am not in favor of how it came about because of shit-head whining.

Date: 2008-10-08 04:03 am (UTC)
avram: (Default)
From: [personal profile] avram
Lots of social progress comes from shit-head whining. (Or "All progress depends on the unreasonable man" as GB Shaw put it.)

Date: 2008-10-08 02:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] saikogrrl.livejournal.com
I think it's pathetic that the selfish asshats they think they won, but if it's true what people are saying about the revision, I also think that it's kind of cool that gay married couples can put bride and bride or groom and groom. "Party A" and "Party B" sounded kind of cold and clinical.

Date: 2008-10-08 03:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] trinityvixen.livejournal.com
See, it's not that I disagree with the ends, just that I don't think it justifies the means.

Profile

trinityvixen: (Default)
trinityvixen

February 2015

S M T W T F S
1234567
89 1011121314
15161718192021
22232425 262728

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 30th, 2026 05:04 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios