Best line since "KNEEL BEFORE TOD!"
Apr. 2nd, 2009 11:32 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Because
ivy03 will murder me if I don't...
Ahem, best line? "I am the prophet Chuck!"
Hee. Also, I love Castiel. And Zachariah showed up yesterday and he's my new favorite thing ever.
On the subject of fangirling, however, SPN fangirls on my f'list answer me this: How did you read those comments that Dean and Sam made about the way the in-show fangirls treated them? It came across as very knowing, very aware, so kudos to the showrunners for being more in tune with their audience than, say, the team behind Heroes. But it also wasn't very flattering, and it is now canon that the characters are totally repulsed by the things that you do/say about them on the internet. Are you miffed at all or are you taking this solely as teasing?
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Ahem, best line? "I am the prophet Chuck!"
Hee. Also, I love Castiel. And Zachariah showed up yesterday and he's my new favorite thing ever.
On the subject of fangirling, however, SPN fangirls on my f'list answer me this: How did you read those comments that Dean and Sam made about the way the in-show fangirls treated them? It came across as very knowing, very aware, so kudos to the showrunners for being more in tune with their audience than, say, the team behind Heroes. But it also wasn't very flattering, and it is now canon that the characters are totally repulsed by the things that you do/say about them on the internet. Are you miffed at all or are you taking this solely as teasing?
no subject
Date: 2009-04-03 03:41 am (UTC)Also, hilariously, fangirls have just become Serious Commentators on a future gospel. Just. I love it.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-03 03:48 am (UTC)But I guess I never thought that the fangirls were, in exchange for a light admonition from the characters, being folded into the new gospel. They're the Paul's Letters to the [fill in the blank]s of this new testament. However, that, too, is a little less than flattering given how restrictive and oppressive (not to mention flagrantly misleading or just plain wrong) Paul could be in his promoting the teachings of a new religion to the far flung heathen peoples...
no subject
Date: 2009-04-03 03:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-03 02:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-03 03:45 am (UTC)>.>
At least, not for this fandom.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-03 03:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-03 03:53 am (UTC)Yeah, maybe I could plausibly hypothesize about either or both having bi experiences or leanings but Supernatural - as aired - is not about a big gay incestuous love story. That's what fic is for. IMHO, the reaction that Sam and Dean gave with regards to slash fiction was relatively calm and reasonable. These are written as two straight brothers who aren't fucking. I think your average pair of straight brothers who aren't fucking could be expected to be reasonably squicked by the prospect of people they don't know writing about them fucking.
I'd expect them to be squicked by the idea of me writing about them fucking. I'd expect most of the characters (as written in canon) I slash to be either squicked or perplexed or both by the shit I write them doing. I don't see it as a judgement of me (Aaron Sorkin's bullshit felt judgy). I see it as playful, relatively kind hearted, teasing. I think they could have been (reasonably) far more freaked or squicked.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-03 02:19 pm (UTC)And now I know.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-03 04:01 am (UTC)My own feeling was yes, those were sharp digs but I didn't feel they were nasty. Because they mocked themselves as much as they mocked the fandom.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-03 02:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-03 02:24 pm (UTC)Which was my reaction--I don't write wincest but there was enough other stuff on-point to make *me* squirm...
I dunno...I didn't read it as a slight. I mean yes, they were mocking, but not in a condemning way. Yanking our chain and having their fun.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-03 02:27 pm (UTC)I wonder if the actors are as much aware of this as the rest of the creative team? I suppose it would be hard to avoid for any internet savvy person, but the slash stuff? I wonder. I don't think I'd go near fanfic for anything I was working on, knowing the internet like I do, but I don't know that everyone has enough forewarning to do so...
no subject
Date: 2009-04-03 06:21 pm (UTC)Oh, they're aware. Fans have made them aware. Poor Misha actually said at the last con he wanted to learn more about slash. He's going to get sent so much eyeball melting stuff because of that.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-03 06:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-03 06:34 pm (UTC)I mean, it crossed my mind. Gen writers could claim that it disgusts Dean, clearly Sam and Dean are not doing it, therefore it's not canon and argue people shouldn't write it.
That will be when I fall off my chair laughing (again). Because uh...since when has "not!canon" ever been a good reason to not write something?
no subject
Date: 2009-04-03 06:43 pm (UTC)I just get this feeling of a whole new set of people being disgusted by my fandom.
This could also be because I'm about to go to ICON, where I have previously faced serious hatred of slash. And this mention just feels like the showrunners handing them a loaded gun to point at me.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-03 06:45 pm (UTC)Which is why I asked the question in the first place. Because while I see it as a point for humor, I could see how negative this commentary could be as well. It plays to, as you've pointed out, one segment of fans over the other--it's put an "eww!" face on the slashers. Canonically. Now, that can be a teasing from the show runners, but people who are not those people won't necessarily see it that way. I'm not, clearly, seeing that way. Not entirely.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-03 07:06 pm (UTC)My original thinking had been concerned with the view from within--are the showrunners really being nasty to fandom, y/n. (My opinion is no). But there is a real question of what this means with millions of viewers who have no idea what fandom is and how they'd react.
But I don't think SPN shouldn't have done it. If anything, it's a step towards making fanfic more socially acceptable. Since you first have to make people aware of something in order to get them to accept it.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-03 09:37 pm (UTC)I did laugh, I'll admit. (I should also point out that, even though this is "canonical anti-wincest," it's pretty damn easy to use it to justify wincest.) But I'm really uncomfortable with show runners talking about slash in interviews, let alone on the show. I really prefer just to be left alone. Especially when the group pointing and laughing has a huge platform and those being pointed at have...no platform at all.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-03 09:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-04 01:22 am (UTC)They also called out LARPers in this. I wonder if there's any reaction to that--though LARPing is a bit more well known, and honestly, the LARPers have got to just be used to it by now.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-03 06:52 pm (UTC)But then...my general sense about fanfic is that under the radar is the best policy. This was...above the radar. This was a big flashing neon sign going SLASHFIC HERE.
Hatred of slash at ICON? You'll have to fill me in on that sometime. Wow.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-03 06:16 pm (UTC)You're right, I would have. :)
I pretty much don't like it when shows go meta, in general, because it's a bit like the watching the writers beat off. In this case, they had a pretty good in show reason for it. As to how the way they treat fans...I don't like being called out in a show, positive or negative, but I don't really expect showrunners to have a better opinion of fans than that. I've read con reports. At the last con, somebody tried to get a security guard to through out Jensen's girlfriend. So it's not like they have reason to like us.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-03 06:22 pm (UTC)I dislike meta-ness in shows myself. In this case, they had a preset way around it, so it didn't bother me overly. I think the previous bits of fan-baiting (like Dean-the-corporate-guy telling Sam he wasn't interested) are a little more egregious than this. This was the way to run with the meta if they were going to do it. I'm a little worried about the preview for next week, however, since it's looking like more meta, even if that meta doesn't (somehow) affect the story.