::twitch::

Jun. 25th, 2010 10:46 am
trinityvixen: (cock)
I had a little heart attack reading this update on sci-fi films coming soon to theaters near me because it unfortunately involved mention of a Channing Tatum movie too near a mention of a Mass Effect movie. The heart attack was not helped by the fact that Channing Tatum, pictured in the link wearing his stupid super-suit from that lamentable G.I. Joe, looks remarkably like male Commander Shepard.

Dear Hollywood: I'm not sold on the idea that Mass Effect even needs a movie. It's already more cinematic than most "films" you churn out these days. You'd only ruin it, so leave it alone. But if you have to move on this property, FOR FUCK'S SAKE, DON'T CAST CHANNING TATUM IN IT. Go with female Shepard. I double-dog dare you. Not only is she cooler, but she is also a woman! You could hit, like, a nerd trifecta--a serious sci-fi movie, based on a videogame, with an awesome female protagonist! DO IT.

But seriously, don't make a Mass Effect movie.

Also, TEH LOLS from comments on the article:
"I wonder if you got Sam Worthington and Channing Tatum in the same room, could you create a charisma singularity?"

That's the kind of nerdy awesome I needed. Thanks, commenter!
trinityvixen: (thinking Mario)
There are no spoilers here, just some musings on what I got from the show over its run. )

As touching as the finale was, I'm not really all that sad for LOST to be over. I mean, I'll miss the fun of watching it, of being constantly on the edge of going crazy trying to work things out, and I think I'll never love some of the actors in it in anything else they do. But the show itself needs to retire, gracefully--something I think the finale will help. It's not LOST's fault that it got over-exposed in its last season, that it was so popular that there were, I shit thee not, about five covers on Entertainment Weekly alone devoted to tales of the last days and episodes of LOST. They worked hard to build their audience, to respect their creation as much as exploit it, and they deserve some measure of popularity. If pop culture is a waste zone in this depressed time, it makes sense that LOST would be everywhere.

Doesn't mean I'm unreasonable when I say I'm tired of it, though. I'm happy to geek out about the finale with folks for a while, but I'm most looking forward to that point, in a month or so, when the distractions of summer and what-not put LOST on the back burner indefinitely. I can only hope that what people learn about this show is not that it needs to be extended (no spin-offs, please), copied (Flash Forward has shown how poorly the imitations are received), or prolonged in the pop cultural memory. I hope, instead, what they see is a show that thrived on trusting its audience to follow it and benefitted from breaking the mold, not re-inventing it. If the most studios learn from LOST is to grant creators of popular shows the ability to call the show off when it needs to be done, I'll be happy.

So long, LOST. It's been a long, strange road, and I wouldn't have missed it for the world.

(Note: there may be spoilers in comments!)
trinityvixen: (bullshit right?)
There's nothing wrong with the Looney Tunes as they are.

They did already try this--several times. You know what "reboot" of the Looney Tunes actually worked? Tiny Toons. And why did that work? Because it was as random and wantonly violent and silly as the originals. Rebooting the looney tunes as either super heroes (?) or in some kind of...sitcom (!?) is just stupid, and everyone knows that.

Want to keep the Looney Tunes relevant? Make more of the old style of cartoon. Hell, keep rerunning the old cartoons. Just stop with the reboots already.
trinityvixen: (thinking Mario)
[livejournal.com profile] moonlightalice: I love that Kenneth Branagh as a director basically creates Kenneth Branagh Mary Sues. Thor looks just like him. Also, hi.
[livejournal.com profile] trinityvixen: hi! he does! totally! For those times when he can't play the hero, he substitutes his doppleganger.
[livejournal.com profile] moonlightalice: What a self-absorbed weirdo. I'm surprised he didn't insist on casting himself to begin with
[livejournal.com profile] trinityvixen: I'm surprised he cast anyone BUT him as Odin. It would have been better than casting Anthony Hopkins, though. As blowhard-y as Branaugh is, he does still try. Anthony Hopkins got an Oscar and gave up on acting.
[livejournal.com profile] moonlightalice: He doesn't NEED to try anymore. You're lucky he even shows up to film things. He put in his time as a real actor. I mean, it's not like he's doing commercials coughShatnercough He has some dignity left.
[livejournal.com profile] trinityvixen: NO ONE would hire Anthony Hopkins for commericals. People would cross the street rather than buy their products.
[livejournal.com profile] moonlightalice: If Hopkins were to do ads, what do you think he'd hawk?

Inquiring minds want to know!

Naturally, Moonlightalice has plenty of her own ideas on the subject. )
trinityvixen: (kitteh!)
See if you can keep yourself from giggling watching this and see if you can watch it without getting the song stuck in your head. (PS: YOU CAN'T.)
trinityvixen: (got nothing)
ETA: This, for my money, is the best ostrich scene in a movie ever, so there really isn't any reason to make another movie with an ostrich in it, is there? Unless it's a documentary about ostriches, I guess.



Sorry it's in...um. Just imagine that Seannnnnn William Scott is telling Ashton Kutcher that those are not, in fact, llamas, but ostriches. Which they are.

So. You may not remember, but you are all bound by loyalty oaths of friendship to me. By agreeing to be my friend, you clicked past the EULA that said, explicitly, that you will abide by certain terms and conditions in being my friend. One of those terms is my right to rewrite history. In return for giving me this right, I promise not to abuse it in fights about anything substantial. I just get to pretend I never said things that I said, possibly in this very forum where it's all still there for anyone to see. For instance, you're not allowed to look back at my review of Avatar and go, "Gee, you seemed to like Sam Worthington in that," when I, eventually, post about what a non-entity he is as a person and character in Terminator Salvation. You can't. I invoke my right.

I have the right to rewrite history, which is ironic given that I'm invoking that right again about the Prince of Persia movie. (For those of you not immediately understanding the irony, God, read Wikipedia will you?) I may have said to some of you that I don't particularly think that Prince of Persia has to be bad. It looked like The Pirates of the Caribbean in Persia, which isn't necessarily a bad thing, especially since the in-the-works fourth Pirates is the worst thing I've heard of in a while. It didn't have to be terrible. From the trailers, it looked about as good or bad as Pirates did, which, hey, could mean it's awesome even though Jake Gyllenhaal has about as much talent as some of Johnny Depp's toenail clippings. (No knock on Gyllenhaal, there, just, it's Johnny Depp, people.)

Then I read the following blog post and watched the video about shooting the movie. If I could sum up the reason for invoking my friendly obligation rights in two words, those words would be ostrich racing. If I could sum up the reason in four words, they would be the ones coming out of Alfred Molina's mouth in that featurette: Behold, the mighty ostrich!

Please, don't watch that featurette. Just don't. Besides the ridiculousness of Jerry Bruckheimer going "Dur, we filmed in Morocco 'cause it's OLD!" there was, I believe, a very spoiler-y part that is in the trailers to a lesser degree. If you've played the game the film is ostensibly based on, you'll know which scene I mean.

Yes, so, remember how I never said Prince of Persia couldn't possibly be an entirely worthless movie? Well, I never did say that. Never happened. I don't know what you're talking about.

(Of course, I also invoke my right to reverse myself without warning should this film turn out to be slightly less mortifying to watch than, say, Aztec Rex. It's all there in the EULA, folks. You really should read those things.)

Evil = sexy

Feb. 4th, 2010 11:02 am
trinityvixen: (hit it)
Proof positive that being evil makes you sexier than being good (besides random episodes of Smallville wherein anyone possessed by evil in any way suddenly looks like they stepped out of a Pantene commercial)?

The proof is in the bomp-chicka-wow-wow! )

In other news, my Oscar kitty jumped into my lap for love last night, which I gave (around shooting things in my game). I noticed he'd hurt the inside of his ear. I figured it was from a fight with Wally. But then I noticed he'd hurt the outside of his ear as well. There's a big spot where there is a shallow wound and no hair. The spot is slightly smaller than a dime but too large to be a bite or claw mark. I wonder if he burned it on the radiator they're always sitting by? Poor baby. I cuddled him good. I don' know what it is about me and cats. They're always getting their widdle ears wounded. Poor Oscar.
trinityvixen: (!!!!)
Four words: Dynasty Warriors Credit Card!!!!

One thing though: I have no idea who that dude on the cover is. Is he Lu Bu after his Ice Mage transformation stage or what?
trinityvixen: (Default)
So, how about a link to the next in the series of Austen-and-monsters literature? Could this be even better than Pride and Prejudice and Zombies?

There is a trailer. Holy shit, these are going to make even better movies than books if this is any indication.
trinityvixen: (science!)
The folks who posited "JAFO" as an answer to my "Quel de Fuck, NG?" post from yesterday are probably closer to the money.

He just asked me if I knew anything about pipettes.

::headdesk::

Specifically? He didn't know how to read the numbers on the micropipettor so that he could pipette the amount he wanted

Maybe I should show him this:


Now, maybe that is all impenetrable nonsense to non-science folks. However, if you watch at 1:25 or so, you'll see exactly how to read a micropipette in order to select exact quantity of solution you wish to aspirate. You twist the numbers until they read, top to bottom, the number. NG was sure that it read bottom to top.

He had two weeks of training with his predecessor before he started. WTF?
trinityvixen: (kitty what?)
Am I just paranoid or is looking over someone's shoulder at what they're doing on the computer really fucking creepy? Today, I was watching The Colbert Report in a tiny corner of my screen, and the New Guy (hereafter referred to as N.G.) looked over at my computer and asked if I was going into the Army. Context: Colbert was doing a mock trial of basic training to get ready for his Iraq shows, so there were dudes in fatigues. But still? Why would you assume, from one video, that I was necessarily contemplating participating in the activities that take place in the video? Why do pictures of planes = I know people who are dead in plane crashes!?

Also, he's asked me twice now how to do basic--and I mean cripplingly amateurish--things in Excel and Word. He wanted to move a few lines down on a spreadsheet. I was like, "Er, copy-paste?" I got a none-too-well-defined demurral. I say, "Copy, paste, erase the duplicate row?" and he goes "Yeah, but..." That's it. Yeah, but, and mumbles. I then say, "Uh, insert a row?" That does the trick! (!?)

Then he wanted to know how to get back to typing outside of a table in Word. (He made a table; he couldn't get out of it to keep typing normally.) He has a different version than me, so rather than dick around with the seemingly minor but probably annoying differences that would prevent me from telling him how to do it, I just suggest "Copy-delete-carriage returns-paste in the middle." (As in, copy the table, delete it, hit return a billion times, paste the table in the middle, then voila! You can type outside the table again.)

It took him roughly two minutes (no exaggerations here) to figure out how to select the table properly to copy it. And that was after he whined about how he didn't want to delete the table because what if it didn't copy right? I was like, "Undo function is your friend, dude." If I'd known how much trouble he'd have with the copy part, I might not have been so flippant. I'm still a little scared that he regarded the undo function as something of a revelation.

Profile

trinityvixen: (Default)
trinityvixen

February 2015

S M T W T F S
1234567
89 1011121314
15161718192021
22232425 262728

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 3rd, 2025 09:40 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios